POLL RESULTS: Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow is running for re-election next year in a Michigan political climate in which most voters agree with the immigration-reduction promises Donald Trump made as he won the state's electoral votes last year.
- Will Sen. Stabenow support the RAISE Act? A survey by Pulse Opinion Research has found that all components of the bill are strongly favored by Michigan’s "likely mid-term" voters?
- Or will Sen. Stabenow take the risk of supporting the high-immigration position which Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton espoused last year. Many analysts on left and right have suggested that her immigration stances -- which were often interpreted as insensitive to American workers -- may have been a key factor in losing swing states like Michigan which cost her the election.
PAST VOTERS FOR SEN. Stabenow WANT IMMIGRATION CUT BY AT LEAST HALF
In next year's election, Sen. Stabenow will be answering to Michigan voters who polled 64% to 22% in favor of cutting legal immigration from the current one million a year to a half-million or less. That reduction is what would happen under the RAISE Act, introduced by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) with Pres. Trump at the White House in late July.
The NumbersUSA-commissioned poll indicated that going against the RAISE Act and significant cuts in legal immigration not only would go against the desires of the overall Michigan electorate but also among Sen. Stabenow's base of voters who have supported her in the past.
Among likely mid-term voters who said they have cast ballots for Sen. Stabenow in the past, 53% said they want legal immigration cut to a half-million or less, while 31% said keep it at a million a year or more.
Of those Stabenow supporters who called for reductions, a little under third said cut to 500,000, approaching half said cut to 250,000 and almost another third answered that they would prefer zero legal immigration.
MICHIGAN GROUPS WITH LOTS OF SWING VOTERS WANT CUTS
Support for the RAISE Act reductions is even higher among demographic groups that are seen as holding a lot of the all-important swing voters who will be deciding close elections next year.
Here is the split in favor of immigration cuts to a half-million or lower vs. those in favor of a million or more:
- 63% - 22% Independents
- 65% - 19% Moderates
- 71% - 18% Catholics
- 62% - 25% Union Households
- 62% - 23% Suburban Voters
- 74% - 14% Voters without a College Degree
The splits in favor of deep reductions tended to be even greater among swing voters who voted for Trump last year:
- 84% - 10% Independents voted for Trump
- 90% - 10% Democrats voted for Trump
Perhaps most telling of all was the 6-to-1 preference for deep immigration cuts among likely Michigan voters who said immigration is in their top 3 issues. The passion among Michigan voters is clearly on the side of the chief aspect of the RAISE Act, which is to greatly reduce the number of foreign citizens added to the country each year with life-time work permits.
As constituents communicate with Sen. Stabenow about whether she will stand with Michigan voters for less foreign worker competition, they might remind her that this poll found that only 14% of voters who are passionate about immigration policy want to continue the current immigration levels or increase them.
And Sen. Stabenow will need to keep an eye on the 81% of passionate voters who want to cut immigration numbers by at least half -- 34% want to cut to zero!
ROY BECK is Founder & President of NumbersUSA
(The poll of 1,000 Michigan voters had a margin of sampling error of 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. For more information on this poll, see https://www.numbersusa.com/news/michigan-voters-cut-legal-immigration-least-half)
The exact wording of the polling question was: QUESTION: Current federal policy automatically adds about one million new legal immigrants each year giving all of them lifetime work visas. Which is closest to the number of lifetime immigrant work visas the government should be adding each year -- none, 250,000, half a million, one million, one and a half million, two million, or more than two million?
