More than 24 Republican lawmakers have urged the United States Supreme Court to hear a case brought by a group of tech workers (Washington Alliance of Technology Workers) challenging the existence of a student visa work program created by a federal rule from DHS that blatantly circumvents congressional oversight.
The Optional Practical Training (OPT) program has become the largest single guest worker program in the country and was created entirely via regulation without the review or approval of Congress.
Fox News summarizes:
OPT allows foreign students on F-1 visas to work for up to three years after they graduate. Foreign nations in the OPT program are exempted from payroll taxes, effectively giving employers an 8% cost advantage in hiring them over American workers.
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) includes no reference to postgraduate employment for F-1s and unambiguously states that the alien’s sole purpose in the United States is to pursue a course of study.
Despite that, last year a D.C. Circuit Court panel found that the F-1 definition speaks only to the admission of aliens into the United States and is silent as to conditions of stay. In effect, the court said that as long as the executive branch follows the law when first admitting an alien, it can then create whatever rules it wants to apply to the alien once in the U.S.
After their loss in the D.C. Circuit Court, the tech workers' group is now appealing to the High Court to have the previous ruling overturned - such calls to the Supreme Court have garnered the support of 31 Republican lawmakers.
Rep. Brian Babin, co-chair of the House Border Security Caucus and signatory on the amicus brief, told Fox News,
Congress has authority over immigration law – NOT unelected bureaucrats.
My colleagues and I are hopeful the Supreme Court will overturn the D.C. Circuit Court’s ruling and combat executive branch efforts to liberalize and manipulate immigration law without congressional authorization. This sets a dangerous precedent that cannot be ignored.
The lawmakers said in their brief that the D.C. Circuit's decision "has far-reaching consequences for the legislative branch beyond immigration law."
"The majority opinion creates a dangerous precedent whereby any congressional action is ripe for executive overreach and can be simply ignored. Where executive branch policy considerations are able to override the valid exercise of legislative functions, the separate yet equal branches of government are no longer equal," the brief states.
You can read the full article here.
