Reduce Amnesty Enticements
American Families United Act
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 2095, the American Families United Act, would grant amnesty to an estimated 5 million illegal aliens by allowing the illegal-alien parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents to apply for a waiver from the 3-year and 10-year bars. The bill also authorizes judges to decline to order an alien removed, deported, or excluded and terminate related proceedings or grant permission to reapply for admission or for relief from removal where it would result in a separation hardship for the family.
Encourage New Legalized Immigrants to Start Training Act
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 1989, the Encourage New Legalized Immigrants to Start Training (ENLIST) Act, would provide amnesty in the form of conditional legal permanent residence to aliens who enlist in the U.S. Armed Forces. Eligible aliens must have been unlawfully present in the U.S. prior to 2012, continuously present in the U.S. since that date, younger than 15 upon initial entry, and otherwise eligible for enlistment. That conditional status is rescinded if the alien separates from the Armed Forces prior to completing the term of enlistment for anything other than honorable conditions.
Executive Amnesty Prevention Act
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R.1715,, the Executive Amnesty Prevention Act, which is one of the strongest legislative responses to Pres. Obama's unconstitutional executive amensties. The bill would block funding from Pres. Obama's 2012 DACA amnesty and his 2014 DAPA amnesty. It would also prevent any current or future illegal alien from receiving a worker permit.
IN STATE Act of 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 1507, the IN STATE Act of 2015, would grant amnesty to illegal aliens who enlist in the military. The bill would also allow illegal aliens who meet the "Dreamer" requirements to receive in-state tuition rates.
H.R. 227
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 227 would block funding for Pres. Obama's executive DAPA amnesty announced in Nov. 2014 and renewals for his 2012 DACA amnesty. This amnesty would result in work permits for approximately 7.1 million illegal aliens who are parents of U.S. citizens or meet other requirements.
Immigration Accountability Act
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 206, the Immigration Accountability Act, would block funding for Pres. Obama's executive DAPA amnesty announced in Nov. 2014 and renewals for his 2012 DACA amnesty. This amnesty would result in work permits for approximately 7.1 million illegal aliens who are parents of U.S. citizens or meet other requirements.
Equal Protection for American Workers Act
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 205, the Equal Protection for American Workers Act, would prevent the administration from issuing work permits to anyone who is deemed to have been illegally present in the United States.
Defund Amnesty Act of 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R.155, the Defund Amnesty Act of 2015, would block funding for Pres. Obama's executive DAPA amnesty announced in Nov. 2014. This amnesty would result in work permits for approximately 5 million illegal aliens who are parents of U.S. citizens.
Save America Comprehensive Immigration Act of 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R.52, the Save America Comprehensive Immigration Act of 2015, would grant amnesty to 11 million illegal alien living in the United States. The legislation would also double the caps in chain migration categories, double the visa lottery, grant amnesty to foreign citizens who currently have Temporary Protected Status, and repeal any bans on funding for sanctuary cities. The legislation does include some improvements to border security.
Preventing Executive Overreach on Immigration Act of 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 38, the Preventing Executive Overreach on Immigration Act of 2015, would block funding for Pres. Obama's executive DAPA amnesty announced in Nov. 2014. This amnesty would result in work permits for approximately 5 million illegal aliens who are parents of U.S. citizens. The legislation, however, would prevent an exemption, allowing some illegal aliens to receive amnesty.
Defense of Legal Workers Act of 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 32, the Defense of Legal Workers Act of 2015, would block funding for Pres. Obama's executive DAPA amnesty announced in Nov. 2014 and renewals for his 2012 DACA amnesty. This amnesty would result in work permits for approximately 7.1 million illegal aliens who are parents of U.S. citizens or meet other requirements.
Prevention of Executive Amnesty Act of 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 31, the Prevention of Executive Amnesty Act of 2015, would block funding for Pres. Obama's executive DAPA amnesty announced in Nov. 2014. This amnesty would result in work permits for approximately 5 million illegal aliens who are parents of U.S. citizens.
Separation of Powers Act of 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 29, the Separation of Powers Act of 2015, would block funding for the issuance of green cards to any illegal aliens unless the alien's case is reviewed on an individual basis and it's for urgent humanitarian reasons. It would also block funding for the issuance of green cards or work permits to any illegal alien currently living in the United States.
Expressing the sense of Congress that the President’s executive amnesty is illegal notwithstanding passage of H.R. 240, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2015.
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportExpressing the sense of Congress that the President's executive amnesty is illegal notwithstanding passage of H.R. 240, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2015.
Asylum Reform and Border Protection Act of 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 1153, the Asylum Reform and Border Protection Act of 2015, represents one of the most thorough responses to the surge of unaccompanied alien children (UACs) at the Southwest border. Aside from repealing the requirements that resulted in UACs from contiguous countries receiving differing treatment than those from noncontiguous countries, this bill requires immigration officers to order all illegal entrants removed upon screening, absent an asylum claim. In order to encourage cooperation with return, foreign countries who resist repatriation will face cuts to foreign assistance.
Repeal Executive Amnesty Act of 2015
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R.
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2014
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeA bill making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes. The bill would give Pres. Obama more than $2 billion to address the border surge crisis.
H.R. 5272
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 5272 would defund DACA. The bill represents a serious effort to address the true cause of the current border crisis: President Obama's contempt for immigration law. The bill's language prevents the Obama Administration from expanding the existing illegal DACA amnesty program by using the primary power the Constitution reserves for the House of Representatives, the power of the purse. It prohibits the use of federal funds or resources for any further deferred action or work authorization for illegal aliens.
Making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes.
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportMaking supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes.
Asylum Reform and Border Protection Act of 2014
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 5137, the Asylum Reform and Border Protection Act of 2014, represents one of the most thorough responses to the surge of unaccompanied alien children (UACs) at the Southwest border. Aside from repealing the requirements that resulted in UACs from contiguous countries receiving differing treatment than those from noncontiguous countries, this bill requires immigration officers to order all illegal entrants removed upon screening, absent an asylum claim. In order to encourage cooperation with return, foreign countries who resist repatriation will face cuts to foreign assistance.
S. 2631
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportS. 2631 would prohibit any federal agency or instrumentality from using federal funding or resources to: (1) consider or adjudicate any new or previously denied application of any alien requesting consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals, as authorized by Executive memorandum on August 15, 2012; or (2) authorize any alien to work in the United States who was not lawfully admitted into the United States and who is not in lawful status in the United States on the date of enactment of this Act.
H.R. 5160
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.R. 5160 would prohibit any federal agency or instrumentality from using federal funding or resources to: (1) consider or adjudicate any new or previously denied application of any alien requesting consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals, as authorized by Executive memorandum on August 15, 2012; or (2) authorize any alien to work in the United States who was not lawfully admitted into the United States and who is not in lawful status in the United States on the date of enactment of this Act.
Reclaim American Jobs Caucus
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportReclaim American Jobs Caucus
Immigration Reform Caucus
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportImmigration Reform Caucus
Immigration Reform Caucus
NumbersUSA's Position:
No PositionImmigration Reform Caucus
Reclaim American Jobs Caucus
NumbersUSA's Position:
No PositionReclaim American Jobs Caucus
Immigration Reform Caucus
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportImmigration Reform Caucus
Immigration Reform Caucus No-Amnesty Letter to Speaker Pelosi
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportImmigration Reform Caucus No-Amnesty Letter to Speaker Pelosi
test-s744-cosponsor-grade_rule
H.Res. 1026
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.Res. 1026, the Bipartisan Reform of Immigration through Defining Good Enforcement Resolution, calls for the House to pass a bill mandating the use of the E-Verify system, pass a bill ensuring that America's borders are fully secure, and oppose all amnesty bills in 2010.
IN-STATE for Dreamers Act of 2014
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeS. 1943, the IN-STATE for Dreamers Act, would provide $750 million in grants over a 10-year period for States that provide in-State tuition and financial assistance to “Dreamer students.” Though the fundamental requirements are that the alien student initially entered prior to age 16 and can provide a list of secondary schools attended in the U.S., those two requirements shall be waived for those who demonstrate compelling circumstances for an inability to comply.
IN STATE Act of 2014
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 3921, the IN-STATE for Dreamers Act, would provide $750 million in grants over a 10-year period for States that provide in-State tuition and financial assistance to “Dreamer students.” Though the fundamental requirements are that the alien student initially entered prior to age 16 and can provide a list of secondary schools attended in the U.S., those two requirements shall be waived for those who demonstrate compelling circumstances for an inability to comply.
Family Unity and Employment Opportunity Immigration Act of 1990
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 4300 was a bill to radically increase annual immigration numbers by removing or increasing limits in most immigration categories. As well, H.R. 4300 created the diversity visa lottery. Traditional American immigration had averaged around 250,000 a year until the 1980s when it dramatically rose to around 500,000. Largely as a result of H.R. 4300, annual legal immigration has risen to around 1,000,000 (one million) a year.
Immigration Act of 1990
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeS. 358 was a bill to radically increase annual immigration numbers by removing or increasing limits in most immigration categories. As well, S. 358 created the diversity visa lottery. Traditional American immigration had averaged around 250,000 a year until the 1980s when it dramatically rose to around 500,000. Largely as a result of S. 358, annual legal immigration has risen to around 1,000,000 (one million) a year.
Immigration Technical Revisions Act of 1997
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 2302, the Immigration Technical Revisions Act of 1997, would have allowed 540,000 illegal immigrants from Central America to apply for amnesty, even though they previously had been denied asylum in the United States. Congress eventually passed a much-expanded version of this proposed amnesty by slipping it into an appropriations bill for the District of Columbia (see the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act of 1997).
Central American and Caribbean Refugee Adjustment Act of 1998
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 3553, the Central American and Caribbean Refugee Adjustment Act, would have awarded amnesty to almost 1.2 million illegal immigrants, in addition to the almost one million who were granted amnesty in 1997.
Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act of 1998
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeS. 1504, the Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act, would grant amnesty to 50,000 illegal aliens from Haiti who came to the U.S. before December 31, 1995. It also granted amnesty to their spouses and children, bringing the total number of Haitians to be amnestied to about 125,000. This provision was slipped quietly into an omnibus appropriations bill, and was fully endorsed by President Clinton who signed it into law.
Honduran Refugee Immigration Fairness Act of 1999
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 1007, the Honduran Refugee Immigration Fairness Act, would provide amnesty for all Hondurans who have lived illegally in the United States since 1995.
Restoration of Fairness in Immigration Law Act of 2000
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 4966, the Restoration of Fairness in Immigration Law Act, would have granted amnesty to some 3.6 million aliens from Central America and Haiti. This would have been the largest amnesty in the history of the country, larger even than the 1986 IRCA Amnesty.
Central American and Caribbean Refugee Adjustment Act of 1999
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 36, the Central American and Caribbean Refugee Adjustment Act, was an amnesty bill for about one million Salvadorans, Guatemalans, Hondurans and Haitians, including their spouses and children, who have lived in the United States illegally since December 1, 1995.
H.Con.Res. 350
NumbersUSA's Position:
SupportH.Con.Res. 350 is a No Amnesty resolution that says amnesty should not be granted to individuals who are in the U.S. illegally.
Central American Security Act
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 4037, the Central American Security Act, would expand the NACARA amnesty and grant amnesty to some 2.3 million illegal aliens from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.
Uniting Families Act of 2002
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeS. 2493, the Uniting Families Act, reinstate the Section 245(i) amnesty for one-year that rewards illegal aliens with a de facto amnesty by allowing certain illegal aliens to apply for a green card and to remain in the country while their application is processed.
Immigration, Reform, Accountability, and Security Enhancement Act of 2002
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeS.
Earned Legalization and Family Unification Act of 2002
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 5600, the Earned Legalization and Family Unification Act, would grant amnesty to some 6.5 million illegal immigrants in the United States. It would also increase chain migration by increasing the annual cap on family-based legal immigrants by about 250,000.
Section 245(i) Extension Act of 2001
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeS. 778, the Section 245(i) Extension Act, would have extended the Section 245(i) amnesty for one year. This is an amnesty that allows certain illegal aliens to pay a fine and adjust their status to legal status.
Central American and Haitian Adjustment Act of 1999
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 348, the Central American and Haitian Adjustment Act, would extend the NACARA amnesty to certain illegal aliens from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Haiti.
Student Adjustment Act of 2001
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeH.R. 1918, the Student Adjustment Act, would have granted a defacto amnesty by granting legal status to certain college-age illegal aliens who would qualify to receive in-state tuition rates. An estimated 500,000 to 600,000 illegal aliens would have qualified for this amnesty.
Section 245(i) Extension Act of 2001
NumbersUSA's Position:
OpposeTo expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for adjustment of status under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by extending the deadline for classification petition and labor certification filings, and for other purposes.